Kylver Stone

The Kylver stone, listed in the Rundata catalog as runic inscription G 88, is a Swedish runestone which dates from about 400 CE notable for its listing of each of the runes in the elder futhark.

Contents

Description

The Kylver stone was found during the excavation of a cemetery near a farm at Kylver, Stånga, Gotland in 1903.[1] The stone was a flat limestone rock used to seal a grave and the runic inscription was written on the underside, and could therefore not be read from above. The dating of the stone from 400 CE is based upon the archeological dating of the graves.[1]

The Kylver stone was removed from Gotland and brought to the Swedish Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm where it is not currently on display (2008).

The fact that the inscription was on the inside of a cover to a grave has resulted in speculation that it represented a use of the elder futhark to pacify the dead man in some manner.[2] However, it has been pointed out that there is nothing in the inscription to support this. In addition, there is no evidence that the inscription was made for the purpose of being used on the cover of a grave.[3] There are many examples where stone with runic inscriptions was reused for other purposes.[3] It has been suggested that the likely purpose of making the inscription was for practice or instruction in the carving of the elder futhark.[2]

Inscription

The Kylver stone is inscribed with the earliest known sequential listing of the 24 runes of the elder futhark,[4]

[f] u þ a r k g [w] h n i j p ï z s t b e m l ŋ d o

with the a, s and b runes mirrored compared to later use, and the z rune upside down.

After the last rune follows a spruce- or tree-like rune commonly believed to be a stacked Tiwaz rune.[5] Another interpretation is that it is a stacked bind rune combining six Tiwaz runes used to invoke the god Tyr and four Ansuz runes to invoke the Æsir for protection.[1]

At a separate space the word sueus is inscribed. The meaning of this latter palindromic word is unknown, but it is possible that it is associated with magic.[1] One suggestion presented by Marstrander is that it is a magical writing of the word 'eus' (the nominative form of the word horse) starting from the e and writing either way.[6] However, this suggestion has been criticized as being "linguistically impossible" for that time period.[3] The small inscription also uses the younger futhark version of the s-rune.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Spurkland, Terje (2005). Norwegian Runes and Runic Inscriptions. Boydell Press. pp. 2, 16. ISBN 1-84383-186-4. http://books.google.com/books?id=1QDKqY-NWvUC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=false. 
  2. ^ a b Düwel, Klaus; Heizmann, Wilhelm (2006). "Das ältere FuÞark: Überlieferlung und Wirkungsmöglichkeiten der Runenreihe". In Bammesberger, Alfred; Waxenberger, Gabriele et al. Das FuÞark und Seine Einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-3-11-019008-3. http://books.google.com/books?id=eWwBH3VuudcC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=false. 
  3. ^ a b c Antonsen, Elmer H. (1988). "On the Mythological Interpretation of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions". In Jazayery, Mohammad Ali; Winter, Werner. Languages and Cultures: Studies in Honor of Edgar C. Polomé. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 44–45. ISBN 3-11-010204-8. http://books.google.com/books?id=v56tj2EPZ-YC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=false. 
  4. ^ Elliott, Ralph Warren Victor (1959). Runes: An Introduction. Manchester University Press. p. 14. ISBN 0-7190-0787-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=SDS8AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=false. 
  5. ^ Enoksen, Lars Magnar (1998). Runor. Falun: Historiska Media. p. 44. ISBN 91-88930-32-7. 
  6. ^ Konstantin, Reichardt, The Inscription on Helmet B of Negau, in Language, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1953), pp. 306-316, p.315

External links